Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Sentinel MK III, a date discovered on the grip-post!
Avatar
David Abney
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 69
Member Since:
January 12, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
April 4, 2013 - 10:51 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Recently, while removing the grips to properly clean & oil my High Standard Sentinel MK III, I discovered a date etched into the grip-post. Now, I had seen this before and did not pay too much attention to it as this gun came to me through a pawnshop. The lettering is small I had to get my super-delux reading glasses out to get a good look-see at the numbers etched into the post. I do not know the significance of the numbers etched, other than it appears to be a date! If it is a date, and that is what it appears to be it would seem to conflict with the starting production date of the High Standard MK II and MK III sixguns. I'm sorry I do not have the hardware to post a picture of it but I will take a pic of it to send to the leadership here for their observation and in-put.

The date on the left side of the four-corner post:  08-18-72

The etching was done with a marking-pen ala-police style. I again reiterate that I do not know the signifance of this date. This gun was bought  (by me) from a friend, who horse-traded for it from a pawnshop here in the Columbus, Ga. area.  I thought this very interesting as the original HS Grips were still in place and this gun had been a nightstand king or a safe queen because of the absence of blue wear (like-new cond.). The grips, I don't believe, had ever been off until I took them off for cleaning. This date could have been a previous owners birthdate or the date of "original" purchase. Which, if that is true, contradicts the known Sentinel MK II & III  production start date of 74. Many thanks for any comments on this!

David

Avatar
Charger Fan
Northern Utah

Supporter
Members


Moderators
Forum Posts: 11176
Member Since:
January 24, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
April 5, 2013 - 8:10 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

That is interesting. If the production dates on the HS guns wasn't so well documented by John Stimson, I might buy into an early production idea. As it is though, I think you may be right about the birth date idea, like maybe it was purchased for a son or grandson? If that's the case, whoever it was didn't seem to keep it very long.

Avatar
CHOP IT
GREAT LAKES
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 18
Member Since:
May 5, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
April 5, 2013 - 12:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hey David, There is a book written by James Spacek. Hi Standard Pistols and Revolvers. ava. through Amazon.com. I had this book and since passed it on, but it gives dates,production numbers and pic. of lots of pistols including the Dan Wesson / High Standard pork-chop Sentinel MK II and III model u are referring to. very informative. P.S. that date would be very close if not totally accurate. please pass it on to the archives via. download for all to see in the forum. i would have but broken-computer

LIFE = WHAT A LONG ... STRANGE TRIP ITs BEEN N WITH A TOUCH OF GRAY ...WOW

Avatar
John Stimson
Indianapolis
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 24
Member Since:
May 12, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
July 28, 2013 - 9:05 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

If you will provide the serial number I can probably provide the ship date.  Note that the date on the post is 8/18/1972 which is about 10 months before the earliest shipment of the High Standard MK II and or MK III revolvers by Dan Wesson.  Note Sentinel MK II and MK III shipments began in 1973 not 1974 with up to perhaps 5,000 shipping in 1973.

The following link shows some data on the serial number range and ship date ranges for the High Standard MK II and MK III revolvers.

http://www.histandard.info/Histd/Revolvers%20Sentinels.pdf

 

I would note that the Jim Spacek book will differ from my data but I don't know why since we both used copies of the same factory records.   The same can be said for the late Tom Dance book but he has even more data that conflicts with the factory records.

 

I will say that it is difficult to make a simple declarative statement that is not found to conflict with numerous  exceptions based on the factory records which is one reason that I suspect that books that provide only summary data are found to conflict with the what we sometimes find in the field.

 

In my opinion, the date on the post was done by an owner later in the guns life.  I have found nothing to suggest that assembly dates were put on these guns.   High Standard on the other hand did on some guns during some periods of time apply a two letter assembly date code on their guns.  Certainly this would not apply to the MK II or MK III revolvers since High Standard did not assemble them.

 

 

Avatar
Dave_Ks
Kansas

Range Officer
Members


Range Officers


Dans Club
Forum Posts: 4300
Member Since:
March 27, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
July 30, 2013 - 8:57 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thanks  John!  If we only had clear records of the Dan Wesson's things would be much easier! 

DSCN1339.jpg

Forum Timezone: America/New_York
Most Users Ever Online: 658
Currently Online: 605Dart
Guest(s) 110
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Steve: 10330
SHOOTIST357: 4788
Dave_Ks: 4300
Ole Dog: 4085
Stinger: 3460
Supermagfan: 3254
zoommb: 3161
IHMSA80x80: 3014
Blacktop: 3004
brucertx: 2311
Newest Members:
DavidCot
mrpistol43
Wittype
americangolfpro
KeonalayTieme
Scott England
AKimovd
Bob253615
jackjack53
EQiblySap
Forum Stats:
Groups: 11
Forums: 42
Topics: 16851
Posts: 148447

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 87
Members: 11703
Moderators: 4
Admins: 1
Administrators: Jody
Moderators: lbruce, Charger Fan, rwsem, SCORPIO