November 14, 2012
Well at least I think she had good control!
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/woman-hiding-kids-shoots-intruder/nTm7s/
Dans Club
DWF Supporters
April 20, 2010
You know, it's a shame that the national media wont pick this story up and run it on the front of every newspaper in the country.
It's a perfect case where legitimate gun ownership and use was probably lifesaving. And it makes a good case for more power and higher capacity. It sounds like her 6 shot .38 was barely enough for the job, since that dirtbag still was able to make it out of the house and drive away.
-Lonwolf
"The lion and the tiger may be more powerful, but the Wolf does not perform in the circus"
November 14, 2012
Actually Feinstein has a concealed carry permit. She or her bodyguards would have shot him in a second. Being that she is an important politician, she has a legitimate need to protect herself. We piss ants on the other hand have no such need. Hypocrisy at it's best!
Lonwolf
Yes, a real good reason to have a more power and capacity. If there had been more than one intruder, it would not have been enough. Thanks to Hollywood, most people don't realize that unless it is a real vital shot, you don't die right away, and can usually continue to attack.
A shotgun is your friend.
Mark
1 Guest(s)