Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
POWDER QUESTION
Avatar
jaggman
Emmaus, PA
Member
Members


Dans Club
Forum Posts: 1358
Member Since:
May 17, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
October 5, 2009 - 11:02 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Can I substitute IMR4227 for H4227?  I've read that they are the same but maybe not? Did Hodgdon  buy out IMR and just relabel the IMR or should I not use H4227 where IMR4227 recipes appear? What say Shoot?  poke

Avatar
IHMSA80x80
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3014
Member Since:
April 25, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
October 5, 2009 - 1:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

They are close, but not the same. In my experiences, H-4227 gave higher velocities than the IMR version, but it was usually a half to one grain less than IMR-4227 for the same bullet weights. That was with 180-200 grain bullets.

I have heard rumors, but can't confirm, that new IMR-4227 made in Australia is exactly the same as H-4227, whereas IMR-4227 made elsewhere IS IMR-4227.

In my guns, IMR-4227 seems like it was made for the .357 SuperMag. It works fantastic with the 180-200 grain Silhouette bullets. In the .375 SuperMag, H-4227 is THE powder with the Hornady 220 grain FP. I haven't worked with these powders in the larger 2 SuperMags.

The Savantist

Avatar
jaggman
Emmaus, PA
Member
Members


Dans Club
Forum Posts: 1358
Member Since:
May 17, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
October 5, 2009 - 1:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thanks IMHSA80x80,

The jar of H4227 I just purchased was made in Australia and packaged in the USA, maybe Shawnee Mission, KS.  I'll double check my recipes and also I may use the recipes on the jar.

Range report will be forthcoming.............shooting

Avatar
SHOOTIST357
Colorado Springs, CO

Supporter

Range Officer
Members


Range Officers
Forum Posts: 4788
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
October 5, 2009 - 1:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Well, way back when... I used to use them interchangeably... Then along came the chronograph and I started seeing subtle differences in velocity.  So now I try to stick to one or the other.

SHOOT

Avatar
pops2
beavercreek,oregon
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 811
Member Since:
March 25, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
October 5, 2009 - 2:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

GoodLuckI've used imr 4227 on the 357sm th3 375sm and the 44mag. Have had good results in all. Would not recommend to inner change any load data without working up to desired load. even though reloaders suggust you can IT'S your touschie on the line.WOW

Avatar
788
Boyd, WI
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 75
Member Since:
October 1, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
October 6, 2009 - 6:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

  I have loaded H4227 for years in 357 supermag and loved it. I have tried IMR4227 and the performance just doesn't match up. to get similar loads between the powders, I have found that I generally put slightly more IMR into each load. As always, start with reduced loads & work up to the performance level you want.

 Didn't they stop production of H4227 a couple years ago???? 

Forum Timezone: America/New_York
Most Users Ever Online: 658
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 68
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Steve: 10330
SHOOTIST357: 4788
Dave_Ks: 4300
Ole Dog: 4068
Stinger: 3447
Supermagfan: 3250
zoommb: 3161
IHMSA80x80: 3014
Blacktop: 3004
brucertx: 2311
Newest Members:
Ezdaddy
Edwinfam
mrpski
Myramillan
Gunner 70
Faunsewillawn
LouieCeS
Shawnrug
AnnelKix
MrBigfugh
Forum Stats:
Groups: 11
Forums: 42
Topics: 16837
Posts: 148320

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 87
Members: 11655
Moderators: 4
Admins: 1
Administrators: Jody
Moderators: lbruce, Charger Fan, rwsem, SCORPIO