Supporter
Moderators
Dans Club
February 22, 2009
June 4, 2015
There are a few nice cast w/check 180 and 200 gr bullets out there that work well with my .357 Max. Though IT IS NOT the same cartridge, you may look into them . Midway usually has a good supply. Sierra also has a 180gr full profile jacket that is pretty good on steel. JMHO, Coogs.
Supporter
Range Officer
Moderators
DWF Supporters
Dans Club
December 4, 2011
The 357 SM runs better with heavier weight bullets. A 180 grain works very well. There were issues with flame cutting of the top strap of 357 Supermags, especially in Rugers. This was most notable when lighter bullets in the 125 to 158 grain range were used. These guns like a heavy bullet.
Anything worth doing is worth doing well.
My father
If a man designed it, and a man built it, then a man can fix it.
My grandfather
June 4, 2015
Just remember, the .357 Maximum and the .357 Supermag are two different cartridges. If you use a revolver, heavy bullets, slow burning powders like 4227. Top strap cutting in either a Ruger or Dan Wesson will cease to be an issue after a 1000+ rds. or so. Forcing cone erosion is the biggest problem particularly with light bullets and fast burning powders. In a single shot your pretty good with anything, but the Max/Supermag round was designed with heavy bullets in mind to provide .44 mag + down range performance with less than .44 mag recoil. Great cartridges and both great revolvers. Coogs.
August 9, 2015
I have a ton of 158gr Remington ammo that I have been using.
I was told 158gr is the lightest bullet that is recommended in the supermag. I would like to go heavier but anything heavier than the 158 is impossible to find anymore. Grizzly used to load heavy rounds for the maximum but I think they have pretty much discontinued it now. I have never seen 357 supermag ammo for sale ever. Only maximum.
Tell me more about the forcing cone erosion.
June 4, 2015
The light bullets in combination with fast burning powders would produce an almost sandblasting effect on the forcing cone. This combination, which was the result of people trying to drive a bullet out of the Max/Supermag at mach 4.2, was not what the round was designed for. As the powder is ignited, the bullet "jumps" from the cylinder to the forcing cone, which is a smooth taper, which guides it into the rifleing. The fast burning powders bombard the forcing cone during this process with high pressure gases and particles. This problem was obviously present in the Ruger Maximum. I'm sure it would be/is a problem in the DW if the light bullet/fast powder is used. The initial Ruger forcing cone was 5 degrees. Ruger changed it to 11 degrees which helped a little, especially with accuracy. Don't know what the DW dimensions are. In my opinion Remington never should have loaded the 158gr. round, the idea was that round for hunting out of the 7 1/2 gun, the 180gr round out of the 10 1/2 for shooting steel. I think it's too lite, Remingtons choice of powder didn't help. It's a faster burning powder, can't recall exactly what it is. Hope this helps, Coogs.
Range Officer
Range Officers
Dans Club
February 9, 2009
1 Guest(s)