Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Rotational Cylinder Play
Avatar
Steve
Member

Dans Club
Forum Posts: 10330
Member Since:
March 2, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
November 7, 2010 - 1:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

This question comes up sometimes, and it seems like the best answer we can come up with is "some play is OK, too much is a problem" and the "too much" part is never clearly identified. I know there must be a way to put a number on this, here's a quick experiment I ran today:

1) Revolver secured, with an electronic caliper I took the dimension from the uppermost edge of the uppermost cylinder notch to the opposite side of the top strap. I was careful to register this dimension in an even plane, that is with just the tip of the  top strap caliper engaged on the top strap. Essentially, I was measuring perpendicular to the cylinder axis as evenly as possible from cylinder notch edge to opposite top strap edge.

2) With that dimension recorded, I manually rotated the cylinder clockwise as firmly as possible, and remeasured that same dimension.

3) I repeated the measurement with a counterclockwise rotation, again as firmly as possible

I know that the overall dimension I am measuring will vary from one gun to another, but on the same gun (actually two different ones) so far I have found a total variance of .002" from the cylinder at rest to the cylinder firmly rotated in either direction, and both were evenly split with .001" variance in each direction from the cylinder at rest.

So my question is:

Is this there a reason that this is not a valid way to measure this?

Need some people smarter than me to give some feedback.

I went to a bookstore and asked the saleswoman "Were is the Self Help Section?" She said if she told me, it would defeat the purpose.

George Carlin

Avatar
Charger Fan
Northern Utah

Supporter
Members


Moderators
Forum Posts: 11185
Member Since:
January 24, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
November 7, 2010 - 3:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I think that sounds like a perfectly reasonable way to measure it.Smile

Maybe some of our gunsmith members could weigh in on this & give this method a seal of approval. Or possibly give a better way to obtain the desired measurement?

Avatar
Steve
Member

Dans Club
Forum Posts: 10330
Member Since:
March 2, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
November 7, 2010 - 4:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I'm hoping however we can check this, we might get some data in from across the Forum to try and get a feeling for how much play there can be and still have acceptable, safe results.

I went to a bookstore and asked the saleswoman "Were is the Self Help Section?" She said if she told me, it would defeat the purpose.

George Carlin

Avatar
Charger Fan
Northern Utah

Supporter
Members


Moderators
Forum Posts: 11185
Member Since:
January 24, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
November 8, 2010 - 8:48 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Sounds good, I'll measure some of mine soon...need to buy new batteries for my caliper.Embarassed My 15-2 is easily the sloppiest one I have, so it will be interesting to see how it compares to the others

Forum Timezone: America/New_York
Most Users Ever Online: 658
Currently Online: willy, Steve S., 605Dart, curious Mark
Guest(s) 80
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Steve: 10330
SHOOTIST357: 4788
Dave_Ks: 4300
Ole Dog: 4092
Stinger: 3476
Supermagfan: 3257
zoommb: 3161
IHMSA80x80: 3014
Blacktop: 3004
brucertx: 2311
Newest Members:
curious Mark
Arisha8sn
memiller
twodot
lalendi_zlsi
clancycrabshack@gmail.com
kobi357
someguy2800
Stiverrl
Thumper
Forum Stats:
Groups: 11
Forums: 42
Topics: 16877
Posts: 148614

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 87
Members: 11756
Moderators: 4
Admins: 1
Administrators: Jody
Moderators: lbruce, Charger Fan, rwsem, SCORPIO