data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74783/74783891e2ad2d5a84c7d5ff29c7dee1c7434121" alt="Avatar"
September 26, 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c87f/4c87f4ae0b5c20e40916f1de7ad48efee2508c8c" alt="sp_UserOfflineSmall"
I was exploring Dan Wesson patents and came across a neat one that I don't think every made production, it could be the "holy grail" for collectors if a prototype exists. US patent 4833810
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=5TE3AAAAEBAJ&dq=4833810
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87240/87240e683ec4adba18237484ab89a58e38719f01" alt="Avatar"
Supporter
Range Officer
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc9d6/dc9d60a97cb6008046088dd7e0187754acf34483" alt=""
Range Officers
May 2, 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c87f/4c87f4ae0b5c20e40916f1de7ad48efee2508c8c" alt="sp_UserOfflineSmall"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce233/ce233ebda27924729466efacd2fa2e0549d719d1" alt="Avatar"
Supporter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f681d/f681d0f6d0510826595cb19cefddaff636f41430" alt=""
Moderators
January 24, 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c87f/4c87f4ae0b5c20e40916f1de7ad48efee2508c8c" alt="sp_UserOfflineSmall"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3b56/d3b56351945718f4dafefe6af638ed37ebbefe99" alt="Avatar"
December 21, 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c87f/4c87f4ae0b5c20e40916f1de7ad48efee2508c8c" alt="sp_UserOfflineSmall"
If I were to venture a guess the benefit was likely supposed to be the ability to change barrels and count on having no change in point of impact. Rather like if you have a shroud set up with a scope. As long as the scope is only on the shroud you don't usually see a impact shift when you take off and then re-attach the shroud. Just a guess though, and the extra cost of producing barrels like that along with a likely weakening of the topstrap probably made the negatives outweigh the positives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3b56/d3b56351945718f4dafefe6af638ed37ebbefe99" alt="Avatar"
January 27, 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c87f/4c87f4ae0b5c20e40916f1de7ad48efee2508c8c" alt="sp_UserOfflineSmall"
This was meant to be a way of putting adjustable rear sights on the guns that had "fixed sights". I saw a .357 and a .38 back in the old days (1980?) that had a groove type rear sight with no adjustment. They were made as "carry" or self defense weapons before someone realized that EVERY DAN WESSON was a TARGET killer. I wish DW would have produced this piece of equipment and advertised it... those two revolvers were CHEAP!!!
Baby Huey sends
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3b56/d3b56351945718f4dafefe6af638ed37ebbefe99" alt="Avatar"
April 25, 2008
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c87f/4c87f4ae0b5c20e40916f1de7ad48efee2508c8c" alt="sp_UserOfflineSmall"
SPW1 said:
If I were to venture a guess the benefit was likely supposed to be the ability to change barrels and count on having no change in point of impact.
That is exactly the same benefit of a TC Contender barrel. Each one contains both front and rear sights. Swap barrels and the gun remains sighted in.
The Savantist
1 Guest(s)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9779/d977986547c89c223fe73b6ff1e9843fe0d0f5a7" alt="sp_Information"